[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing & Abstracting::
::
(CC-BY 4.0)

AWT IMAGE

Journal of Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)"

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 12, Issue 3 (J Res Dent Sci 2015) ::
J Res Dent Sci 2015, 12(3): 120-126 Back to browse issues page
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Resin Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations in Primary Teeth: 18-Month Results
M SHokrimozhdehi * , N Ahmadi Rouzbahani , Laila Pishevaresfahani
, maryam.shokrimozhdehi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (11582 Views)

ABSTRACT

 Background and Aim: Recently, within the efforts to improve the properties of glass ionomer cement as a restorative material in dentistry the EQUIA glass ionomer cements is introduced. The purpose of this study is to perform a clinical evaluation of (Japanese) (EQUIA Fill, GC) glass ionomer cement with (Americans) 3M Filtek P60 posterior composites during the follow-up period of 6, 12 and 18 months. 
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial study, 50 children aged 4 to 9 years with small to medium caries lesions on the occlusal surfaces of the mandibular second primary molars were enrolled and randomly their teeth restored with 3M Filtek P60 posterior composite and GI EQUIA . Then, during 6, 12 and 18 months, clinical assessment was done on each restored tooth and according to the USPHS criteria, the marginal integration, color match, marginal discoloration, anatomic form and secondary caries were recorded. Data were analyzed through Wilcoxon and Friedman non-parametric statistical tests. 
Results: At the end of an 18-month follow-up period, the difference between the effect of both restorative materials on color matching, (P=0.317) marginal adaptation, (P=0.414) anatomic form (P=0.317), marginal discoloration, (P=0.564) and secondary caries was not statistically significant. Clinical success rates were similar and acceptable in both restorative materials in different periods. But difference in loss of marginal adaptation was significant after 12 months. (P<0.001) 
Conclusions: The use of 3M Filtek P60 posterior composite and EQUIA glass ionomer cements to restore the primary molars of children is clinically successful. 
 Keywords: Deciduous Teeth, Filtek P60 Composite, Site Resins.
Keywords: Deciduous Teeth, Filtek P60 Composite, Site Resins.
Full-Text [PDF 12 kb]   (2333 Downloads)    
Type of Study: original article | Subject: Pediatrics
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

SHokrimozhdehi M, Ahmadi Rouzbahani N, Pishevaresfahani L. Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Resin Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations in Primary Teeth: 18-Month Results. J Res Dent Sci 2015; 12 (3) :120-126
URL: http://jrds.ir/article-1-661-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 3 (J Res Dent Sci 2015) Back to browse issues page
مجله تحقیق در علوم دندانپزشکی Res Dent Sci
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645