:: Volume 20, Issue 3 (jrds 2023) ::
J Res Dent Sci 2023, 20(3): 83-90 Back to browse issues page
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of an Iranian dental implant system Sinabionic: Clinical Trial
Hamidreza Barikani , Amirreza Rokn , Ghazal Jabalameli , Mehrdad Panjnoush , Mohammad Javad Kharzi Fard , Mohadeseh Heidari *
Implant Research Center , Heidarim@sina.tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3138 Views)
Background and Aim: Dental implants are one of the most accepted methods for tooth replacement, function and esthetic improvement. Sinabionic dental implant (Nikkasht Asia, Iran) was manufactured by grade 5 titanium alloy with Sandblasted, large grit, Acid-etched (SLA) and hydrophilic surface with a porosity of 1.2 to 1.8 µm. The aim of this study was clinical and radiological evaluation of Sinabionic implant system at 3, 6 and 12 month intervals after implant placement surgery.
Material and Methods: After obtaining written consent from the patients, 53 Sinabionic implants (Niktash Asia, Iran) were evaluated in this study.  Pocket depth, bleeding on probing, pus, mobility and pain were evaluated in clinical examination and bone resorption in mesial and distal were assessed in the radiographic examination by one sample t test. Results: 5 failures were observed of 53 implants and 32 implants were successful according to the accepted criteria, which includes 60.4% and the Survival rate of these implants was reported to be 90.6%.
Conclusion:  Clinical and radiographic evaluations of Sinabionic implants indicated success and survival rate less than the accepted standard range. It is strongly recommended that the structure (micro and macro geometry) and surface quality of the implant be modified.


 
Article number: 1
Keywords: Dental implants, Radiography, Dental, Clinical trial, phase I, Survival rate, Periodontal index, Alveolar bone loss
Full-Text [PDF 614 kb]   (1682 Downloads)    
Type of Study: original article | Subject: Dental Implant
References
1. Esposito M, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Blasone R, Malaguti G, Gaffuri C, Caneva M, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel dental implant system as single implants under immediate loading conditions-4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(4):367-79.
2. Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014(7). [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub4] [PMCID]
3. Nemli SK, Güngör MB, Aydın C, Yılmaz H, Bal BT, Arıcı YK. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study. Journal of dental sciences. 2016;11(1):29-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2014.11.003] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Morris HF, Winkler S, Ochi S, Kanaan A. A new implant designed to maximize contact with trabecular bone: Survival to 18 months. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2001;27(4):164-73. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0164:ANIDTM>2.3.CO;2 [DOI:10.1563/1548-1336(2001)0272.3.CO;2] [PMID]
5. Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Singh M, Weber H-P, Gallucci G. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Journal of dental research. 2012;91(3):242-8. [DOI:10.1177/0022034511431252] [PMID]
6. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int j oral maxillofac implants. 1986;1(1):11-25.
7. Branemark P-I. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16.
8. Brånemark PI, Svensson B, Van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clinical oral implants research. 1995;6(4):227-31. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x] [PMID]
9. Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1998;79(4):415-21. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70155-6] [PMID]
10. Sennerby L, Andersson P, Verrocchi D, Viinamäki R. One-year outcomes of Neoss bimodal implants. A prospective clinical, radiographic, and RFA study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14(3):313-20. [DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x] [PMID]
11. Baqain ZH, Moqbel WY, Sawair FA. Early dental implant failure: risk factors. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2012;50(3):239-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.074] [PMID]
12. Al-Sabbagh M, Bhavsar I. Key local and surgical factors related to implant failure. Dental Clinics. 2015;59(1):1-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.cden.2014.09.001] [PMID]
13. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G, et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1996;11(4).
14. Schmitt A, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1993;6(2). [DOI:10.1097/00008505-199312000-00014]
15. Buser D, Schenk R, Steinemann S, Fiorellini J, Fox C, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Journal of biomedical materials research. 1991;25(7):889-902. [DOI:10.1002/jbm.820250708] [PMID]
16. Ormianer Z, Matalon S, Block J, Kohen J. Dental implant thread design and the consequences on long-term marginal bone loss. Implant dentistry. 2016;25(4):471-7. [DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000441] [PMID]
17. Kreve, S., Ferreira, I., da Costa Valente, M.L. et al. Relationship between dental implant macro-design and osseointegration: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg . 2022; 29:1-4. [DOI:10.1007/s10006-022-01116-4] [PMID]
18. Zaarour J, Chrabieh E, Rameh S, Khoury A, Younes R. Effect of the Implant Macro-Design on Primary Stability: A Randomized Clinical Trial. International Arab Journal of Dentistry (IAJD). 2022;13(1):7-15.
19. Gautam H, Yadav G, Bansal R. Implant surface modification as a basis of osseointegration: A narrative review. Journal of Dentistry Defence Section. 2022;16(2):139. [DOI:10.4103/jodd.jodd_13_21]

Ethics code: IR.TUMS.DENTISTRY.REC.1397.064
Clinical trials code: IRCT20151017024573N5

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 3 (jrds 2023) Back to browse issues page